Cases 61 - 70 of 37,529
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03534
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Hung Duong Nguon v. James S. Hill et al
as 2:2024cv02297
Petitioner:
Hung Duong Nguon
Respondent:
James S Hill and Xavier Becerra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel James Harper v. CSP Lancaster et al
as 2:2024cv01748
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
CSP Lancaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Faisal Ashraf v. United States of America
as 8:2024cv00923
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
Faisal Ashraf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Joseph Lawrence Diaz v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv03589
Petitioner:
Joseph Lawrence Diaz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Alberto Munoz v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv03393
Petitioner:
Alberto Munoz
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Noel Gutierrez Amaya v. Warden
as 2:2024cv03481
Petitioner:
Noel Gutierrez Amaya
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jennifer Marshall v. Ricolcol
as 5:2024cv00885
Petitioner:
Jennifer Marshall
Respondent:
Warden Ricolcol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Charles Daniels v. Cortena et al
as 2:2024cv03374
Plaintiff:
Charles Daniels
Defendant:
Cortena, Soto and Guevarra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
