Cases 101 - 110 of 17,468
(HC) Wren v. CHCF Stockton Prison-Hospital
as 2:2024cv00455
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Charles Wren
Respondent:
CHCF Stockton Prison-Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC)McCoy v. Warden at USP Atwater
as 1:2024cv00121
Petitioner:
Reggie L. McCoy
Respondent:
Warden at USP Atwater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Duenas
as 1:2024at00232
Petitioner:
Gustavo Adolfo Duenas
Defendant:
Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Brewer v. Macomber
as 2:2024cv00587
Petitioner:
Charles Brewer
Respondent:
Jeff Macomber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Jackson v. Borla
as 1:2024cv00143
Petitioner:
Douglas V Jackson
Respondent:
Warden Edward Borla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Davis v. People of San Joaquin
as 2:2024cv00734
Petitioner:
Willis Davis
Respondent:
People of San Joaquin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Wolfington v. CDC, et al
as 2:2024cv00529
Petitioner:
Billy Thomas Wolfington Jr. and Billy Thomas Wolfington, Jr
Respondent:
California Department of Corrections, Salinas Valley State Prison and Charles Schuyler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Cruz-Garcia v. Warden, F.C.I. Mendota
as 1:2024cv00076
Petitioner:
Jose Alberto Cruz-Garcia
Respondent:
Warden, F.C.I. Mendota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(HC) Smith v. County of Riverside
as 2:2024cv00688
Petitioner:
Derek Smith
Respondent:
County of Riverside
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Gomez v. Matteson
as 1:2024cv00087
Petitioner:
Alfred Gomez
Respondent:
Giselle Matteson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
