Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Stross v. Lumens Holdco, Inc.
as 2:2019cv01201
Defendant:
Lumens Holdco, Inc. and Lumens Holdco, Inc. Doing business as Lumens.com
Plaintiff:
Alexander Bayonne Stross
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Alexander Stross v. 3 Phaze Electric, Inc.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2018cv02715
Defendant:
3 Phaze Electric Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alexander Stross
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Wild v. Peterson
as 2:2015at01304
Plaintiff:
Alexander L. Wild
Defendant:
Dean B. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Wild v. Pearson Pest Control, Inc.
as 1:2015at00989
Plaintiff:
Alexander L. Wild
Defendant:
Pearson Pest Control, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Wild v. Peterson
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2015cv02602
Plaintiff:
Alexander L. Wild
Defendant:
Dean B. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Wild v. Pearce Pest Control, Inc.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2015cv01877
Plaintiff:
Alexander L. Wild
Defendant:
Pearce Pest Control, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Wild v. Benchmark Pest Control, Inc.
as 1:2015at00987
Plaintiff:
Alexander L. Wild
Defendant:
Benchmark Pest Control, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Wild v. Benchmark Pest Control, Inc.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 1:2015cv01876
Plaintiff:
Alexander L. Wild
Defendant:
Benchmark Pest Control, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Wild v. Benchmark Pest Control, Inc.
as 1:2015at00988
Plaintiff:
Alexander L. Wild
Defendant:
Benchmark Pest Control, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.