Cases 11 - 20 of 30
v. Biggs et al
as 2:2011at00193
Defendant:
Michael Biggs, Susan Curda, Timothy Aitken and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Singh v. United States Department of Homeland Security Immigration & Customs Enforcement et al
as 1:2011at00023
Petitioner:
Inderjit Singh
Respondent:
United States Department of Homeland Security Immigration & Customs Enforcement, Eric H. Holder, Jr., John Morton and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105
Smith v. Rios Jr., et al
as 2:2010cv02108
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
H. A. Rios, Jr. and Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Rios Jr., et al
as 1:2010cv01554
Plaintiff:
Nathan Smith
Defendant:
H. A. Rios, Jr. and Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
La v. Holder, et al
as 2:2010cv01757
Petitioner:
Quang Dien La
Respondent:
Eric H. Holder, Jr., Janet Napolitano, Timothy S. Aitken-Bice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010at00368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009at02060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009at01880
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv01974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Fordjour v. Executive Office for Immigration Review Director et al
as 2:2009cv02806
Petitioner:
Charles A. Fordjour
Respondent:
Executive Office for Immigration Review Director, Board of Immigration Appeals, Board of Immigration Appeals Chairman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
