Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008at00239
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Samut et al v. Chertoff, et al.
as 1:2008cv00599
Petitioner:
KASIM Munir Samut, Samad Begam Samut, IZHAAR Munir Samut and others
Respondent:
Michael Chertoff, Nancy Alcantar and Michael B. Mukasey
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008at00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008at00226
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detainee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00586
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00825
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008at00420
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Abumaali v. Michael Chertoff et al
as 1:2008cv00505
Plaintiff:
Eissa H Abumaali
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Christina Poulos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Abumaali
as 1:2008at00196
Plaintiff:
Eissa H Abumaali
Defendant:
Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez, Christina Poulos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
