Cases 71 - 80 of 103
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02330
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02274
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007at00998
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Hong v. Keisler et al
as 1:2007at00519
Plaintiff:
Ping Hong
Defendant:
Peter D. Keisler, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Hong v. Keisler et al
as 1:2007cv01503
Plaintiff:
Ping Hong
Defendant:
Peter D. Keisler, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Li v. Keisler et al
as 2:2007at00960
Plaintiff:
Yu Lan Li
Defendant:
Peter Keisler, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Hong v. Keisler et al
as 2:2008cv00036
Plaintiff:
Ping Hong
Defendant:
Peter D. Keisler , Michael Chertoff , Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Li v. Keisler et al
as 2:2007cv02171
Plaintiff:
Yu Lan Li
Defendant:
Peter Keisler, Michael Chertoff, Emilio T. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Yafai v. Mueller et al
as 1:2007at00515
Plaintiff:
Tajuddin Yafai
Defendant:
Robert Mueller, III, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Shadkam v. Mueller et al
as 2:2007cv02151
Plaintiff:
Ahmed Shadkam
Defendant:
Robert Mueller, III, Michael Chertoff, Emilio Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
