Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Carr v. Rackley et al
as 2:2016cv01801
Plaintiff:
Marion Alexander Carr
Defendant:
R. J. Rackley, Terri Turner, Steve Mohoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawk v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2015cv02529
Plaintiff:
Shawn Hawk
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Board of Parole Hearings, Forensic Assessment Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawk v. Brown, et al.
as 2:2015cv01548
Plaintiff:
Shawn Hawk
Defendant:
Edmund Brown, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, California Board of Prison Hearings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Soto v. Garner et al
as 2:2015cv00780
Plaintiff:
Santiago Soto
Defendant:
Jack Garner, Barbara Moore and Black
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2013cv01730
Plaintiff:
Oshay Johnson
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Board of Parole Hearings, Brian Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Cate et al
as 2:2012cv02708
Plaintiff:
Gordon Brooks
Defendant:
Matthew Cate, Jack Garner, Dennis Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pena v. Shaffer et al
as 2:2012cv00006
Plaintiff:
Ignacio Polvos Pena
Defendant:
Jennifer Shaffer, Jack Garner and John Iniguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Magee v. Flores et al
as 1:2011cv01239
Plaintiff:
Ruchell Cinque Magee
Defendant:
Peter Flores, K. Comaites , Sue Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Magee v. Garner et al
as 1:2009cv00849
Plaintiff:
Ruchell Cinquz Magee
Defendant:
Jack Garner and Jim Dowling
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Turner v. Sisto et al
as 2:2009cv00484
Petitioner:
Tyrone Turner
Respondent:
Dennis Kris Sisto, J Haviland, Arnold Schwarzenneger and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
