Cases 1 - 10 of 157
Walker v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv02345
Defendant:
C. Banish, Elizarraras, T. Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Kamaron L. Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Taylor v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv02122
Defendant:
Moreno, B. Yang, C/O J. Gregory and others
Plaintiff:
Dydise Demuhl Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Young v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv01869
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, M. Leavens, R. Hibbard and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Powell Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(PC) Herrera v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv01660
Defendant:
Atkins, Jeff Lynch, Mayfield and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. Herrera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Castrellon v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv01622
Defendant:
A. Chavez, B. Waldron, Jeff Lynch and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Castrellon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Iseli v. Lynch
as 2:2024cv01578
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Petitioner:
Branden Willie Iseli
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Grayson v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv01488
Defendant:
Fernandez, Jeff Lynch, Espino and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Grayson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Thompson v. Lynch
as 1:2024cv00611
Petitioner:
DeWayne Thompson
Respondent:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Perryman v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2024cv01437
Defendant:
Bartel, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Jeff McCumber and others
Plaintiff:
David Perryman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Casey v. Lynch et al
as 2:2024cv01316
Plaintiff:
Sean L. Casey, II
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch, Igbokwe and Rojas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
