Other Statutes Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of California
Cases 181 - 190 of 11,813
Quarford v. Dermtech, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv02221
Plaintiff: Elena C. Quarford
Defendant: Dermtech, Inc., John Dobak and Kevin Sun
Watkins v. American Express National Bank
as 3:2024cv00116
Plaintiff: Brian K. Watkins
Defendant: American Express National Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Weikel v. Synchrony Bank
as 3:2024cv00103
Plaintiff: Jason Weikel
Defendant: Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Akkawi et al v. Sadr et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv02168
Plaintiff: Diana Akkawi, Yasmin Akkawi, Katelyn J. Button and others
Defendant: Kasra Sadr, Car Law Firm, The Sadr Law Firm and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1514 A Civil Action to Protect Against Retaliation in Fraud Cases
Cribier v. Carvana LLC
as 3:2024cv00094
Plaintiff: Michael Cribier
Defendant: Carvana LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Stark v. Dream Stays SD, LLC
as 3:2023cv02165
Plaintiff: Collette Stark
Defendant: Dream Stays SD, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv02094
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Ewing v. Camus et al
as 3:2023cv02154
Plaintiff: Anton A. Ewing
Defendant: Pablo Garces Camus and Dboss Funding, LLC
Wiseman v. Synchrony Bank We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01527
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00066
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?