Cases 121 - 130 of 15,653
Harding v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03072
Plaintiff:
Torie M Harding
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Figueroa v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03041
Plaintiff:
Alejandro O Figueroa
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Smith v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv05030
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Elmer Smith
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Christilaw v. Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids Michigan
as 2:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Clara Christilaw
Defendant:
Foremost Insurance Company Grand Rapids Michigan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Getzels et al v. Kirby Ai et al
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Zoe Getzels and Quentin Bodiguel
Defendant:
Kirby Ai, Evie Vaughan and Van Venture Ai LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Mendoza v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00160
Plaintiff:
Alicia Mendoza
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pitts v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03071
Plaintiff:
Summer Pitts
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gaze v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Teddy Gaze
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stevenson v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03039
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Grace Stevenson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Moore v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03040
Plaintiff:
Brendan K Moore
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
