Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Robert L. Kuch v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2008cv03692
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons and Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Harry James Burdick et al v. J.L. Norwood et al
as 5:2009cv01977
Plaintiff:
Harry James Burdick
Defendant:
J L Norwood, P A Castillo, Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Terrance Antonio Baldwin v. J L Norwood et al
as 5:2009cv01590
Plaintiff:
Terrance Antonio Baldwin
Defendant:
J L Norwood, J L Norwood, Bourn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dameon Daley v. J.L. Norwood
as 2:2009cv05575
Petitioner:
Dameon Daley
Respondent:
J. L. Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv05103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Chris Myers et al v. Audrey B. Collins et al
as 2:2009cv01723
Plaintiff:
Chris Myers, Dega Shelton, Ryon McClure and others
Defendant:
Audrey B. Collins, Jacqueline Chooljian, J. L. Norwood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Mike Amaral v. Norwood et al
as 2:2008cv05752
Defendant:
Ali, Dr. Barton, Dr Fernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Mike Amaral
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric E. Houston v. Norwood
as 2:2009cv00268
Petitioner:
Eric E. Houston
Respondent:
Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
James A. McKines v. Joseph Norwood
as 2:2008cv08402
Petitioner:
James A. McKines
Respondent:
Joseph Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
John Gust Westine v. Joseph Norwood
as 2:2008cv03254
Respondent:
Joseph Norwood
Petitioner:
John Gust Westine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
