Cases 31 - 40 of 1,310
Sandoval-Cho, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2252
Petitioner:
MYLVIA SACELA SANDOVAL-CHO and DIEGO ALEXANDER MELCHOR-SANDOVAL
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Thompson, et al. v. Deschutes County Sheriff's Office, et al.
as 24-2113
Plaintiff:
RONALD THOMPSON and RACHEL A. THOMPSON
Defendant:
DESCHUTES COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, JONATHAN EBNER, in both his official and individual capacity, AARON ALEXANDER, in both his official and individual capacity and others
Cordova-Mejia, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1941
Petitioner:
EDGAR ALEXANDER CORDOVA-MEJIA, LEYDEN ALEXANDRA CORDOVA-HENRRIQUEZ, JAIRO RESIERE HENRRIQUEZ-CASTRO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Irvine, et al. v. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center
as 24-1984
Respondent:
ALEXANDER IRVINE and BARBARA TWADDELL
Petitioner:
FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER CENTER
Padilla Cantillano, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1918
Petitioner:
HENRY ALEXANDER PADILLA CANTILLANO, I, REINA LETICIA INTERIANO DOMINGUEZ, KEVIN ALEXANDER PADILLA INTERIANO and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Fair v. Turley, et al.
as 24-1846
Plaintiff:
PARNELL JAY FAIR
Defendant:
LUKAS TURLEY and ALEXANDER RYNDAK
Jerry Alexander et al v. Dean Meiling et al
as 8:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
Jerry Alexander, Marty Cohen, Charles Delle Donne and others
Defendant:
Dean Meiling, Madylon Meiling, Chemeon Surface Technology LLC and others
Jerry Alexander et al v. Dean Meiling et al
as 8:2024mc00008
Plaintiff:
Jerry Alexander, Marty Cohen, Charles Delle Donne and others
Defendant:
Dean Meiling, Madylon Meiling, Chemeon Surface Technology LLC and others
Richmond v. Reese, et al.
as 24-1811
Plaintiff:
MARSHALL CHARLES RICHMOND
Defendant:
MICHAEL REESE, Multnomah County Sheriff, STEVEN ALEXANDER and KURTISS MORRISON
Rivera Orellana, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1747
Petitioner:
ANGEL MAURICIO RIVERA ORELLANA, HELEN YAMILETH CEBILLA DIAZ and MAURICIO ALEXANDER RIVERA CEBILLA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
