Other Statutes Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,307
Prado-Majano v. Garland
as 24-1459
Petitioner: MOISES ALEXANDER PRADO-MAJANO
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cano Velandia, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1409
Petitioner: DEISY ANDRE CANO VELANDIA, JHOSETH SNAYDER VARGAS-CANO, KENNETH M VARGAS-CANO and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Pineda Lopez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1396
Petitioner: ALEXANDER PINEDA LOPEZ, BLANCA FLORES DE PINEDA, FREDY PINEDA FLORES and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Reina de Diaz, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1398
Petitioner: ROXANA GUADALUPE REINA DE DIAZ, DIEGO ENRIQUE DIAZ REYNA and MATEO ALEXANDER DIAZ REINA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Smith v. Haight-Biehler, et al.
as 24-1300
Plaintiff: PIERRE SMITH
Defendant: HEIDI HAIGHT-BIEHLER, Medical Doctor, BASS, First Name Unknown, HSA, Health Services Administrator, BULGER, First Name Unknown, MLP, Health Services Professional and others
Mancia-Espinosa v. Garland
as 24-1275
Petitioner: RUDY ALEXANDER MANCIA-ESPINOSA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
United States of America v. Smirnov
as 24-1133
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: ALEXANDER SMIRNOV
Tai v. Seu et al
as 3:2024cv01198
Plaintiff: Alexander Tai
Defendant: Scott W. H. Seu, Thomas B. Fargo, Celeste A. Connors and others
Padilla Ochoa, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1005
Petitioner: EDWIN ALEXANDER PADILLA OCHOA, ERIKA FAVIOLA BERMUDEZ CRUZ, KENDALL MAYBETH PADILLA BERMUDEZ and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Smirnov v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Los Angeles
as 24-970
Petitioner: ALEXANDER SMIRNOV
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Interested Party: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?