Cases 1 - 10 of 4,253
United States of America v. Noble
as 24-3982
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DANIEL JOSEPH NOBLE
Beck v. Sisolak, et al.
as 24-3907
Plaintiff:
STANLEY BECK
Defendant:
STEVE SISOLAK, CHARLES DANIELS, MICHAEL MINEV and others
Marroquin Maciel, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3854
Petitioner:
LUIS MARROQUIN MACIEL, GUADALUPE ELIZABETH CORTEZ URIAS, ANGEL YAHIR MARROQUIN CORTEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Williams v. Carter et al
as 2:2024cv05225
Plaintiff:
John Williams
Defendant:
Maverick Carter, Gregory B. Maffei, Ping Fu and others
Lopez Ramirez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3799
Petitioner:
INGRID Y LOPEZ RAMIREZ, I, DANIEL E LOPEZ RAMIREZ, I and ANGEL D TELLEZ LOPEZ, I
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Stockton, et al. v. Ferguson, et al.
as 24-3777
Plaintiff:
JOHN STOCKTON, RICHARD EGGLESTON, MD, THOMAS T. SILER, MD and others
Defendant:
ROBERT FERGUSON, Attorney General of the State of Washington and KYLE S. KARINEN, Executive Director of the Washington Medical Commission
Kosher Eats LLC v. Messner Reeves LLP et al
as 2:2024cv05161
Plaintiff:
Kosher Eats LLC
Defendant:
Messner Reeves LLP, Clearwater Premiere Perpetual Master LLC, Torben Welch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Amazon.com, Inc. et al v. Mawuili Adzasoo et al
as 2:2024cv05070
Petitioner:
Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon Logistics, Inc.
Respondent:
Mawuili Adzasoo, Mohammad Albasha, David Oliver Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Castillo Hurtado, et al. v. Garland
as 24-3734
Petitioner:
RICHARD CASTILLO HURTADO, DANIELA CRUZ, RICHARD CASTILLO CRUZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Santos v. Annikos, et al.
as 24-3730
Plaintiff:
RONALD R. SANTOS
Defendant:
KENNETH ANNIKOS, JOSEPH BENSON, N. BRITENBACK and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
