Cases 1 - 10 of 255
David Hough et al v. Ryan Carroll et al
as 2:2024cv02886
Plaintiff:
David Hough, Mouloud Hocine, Jennifer Lehmkuhl Hill and others
Defendant:
Ryan Carroll, Max K. Day, Max O. Day and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Lange v. O'Malley
as 24-1777
Plaintiff:
NICHOLE LANGE
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Daroya Isaiah v. loanDepot, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Daroya Isaiah, Jonathan Rosas, Joel Eggleton and others
Defendant:
loanDepot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Nichols et al v. eHealthInsurance Services, Inc.
as 3:2023cv06720
Plaintiff:
Terri Nichols and Thomas Matthews
Defendant:
eHealthInsurance Services, Inc. doing business as eHealth
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Betschart, et al. v. Garrett, et al.
as 23-3573
Petitioner:
WALTER BETSCHART, JOSHUA SHANE BARTLETT, CALEB AIONA and others
Respondent:
PATRICK GARRETT, SHERIFF, Washington County Sheriff, in his official capacity and STATE OF OREGON
Nichols v. The Baldwin Group, LLC
as 5:2023cv05674
Plaintiff:
Terri Nichols
Defendant:
The Baldwin Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023at01108
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Nichols v. Guidetoinsure, LLC
as 5:2023cv04920
Plaintiff:
Terri Lee Nichols
Defendant:
Guidetoinsure, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
