Cases 71 - 80 of 752
Thompson v. Inman et al
as 6:2022cv01783
Plaintiff:
Randy Thompson
Defendant:
Walker P. Inman, III, Keith Kelsch and Malissa Kelsch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Walter v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 3:2022cv01708
Plaintiff:
Daphne Walter
Defendant:
Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Thompson v. Inman
as 6:2022cv01665
Plaintiff:
Randy Thompson
Defendant:
Walker P. Inman, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Conversion
Barton v. Dawson Law Group, PC et al
as 3:2022cv01775
Plaintiff:
Malinda Barton
Defendant:
Dawson Law Group, Bryan Dawson and Dawson Law Group, PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Kinne v. Avamere Health Services, LLC
as 3:2022cv01400
Plaintiff:
Lynda Kinne
Defendant:
Avamere Health Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 cl Class Action Fairness Action - 2005
Jackson et al v. Ward
as 3:2022cv01412
Plaintiff:
Julie L. Jackson and Robert A. Parks
Defendant:
Melissa C. Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Poticny v. Movers and Packers Relocation Specialists LLC
as 3:2022cv01243
Plaintiff:
Michael Poticny
Defendant:
Movers and Packers Relocation Specialists LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14706 Interstate Transportation - Carmack Amendment
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Bureau of Land Management
as 6:2022cv01177
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Defendant:
Bureau of Land Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Nettleton v. Exact Sciences Corporation
as 6:2022cv01290
Plaintiff:
Christopher Nettleton
Defendant:
Exact Sciences Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Rouffy v. Walgreen Co.
as 3:2022cv01127
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Rouffy
Defendant:
Walgreen Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
