Cases 131 - 140 of 120,859
Randle v. Fregi et al
as 3:2024cv02098
Plaintiff:
Ramello Randle
Defendant:
Matthew Fregi and John Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randle v. Contra Costa County Sheriff's Department et al
as 3:2024cv02099
Plaintiff:
Ramello Randle
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Sheriff's Department, Beltran, Jensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Holliday v. Madera County Sheriff Office Jail Division
as 1:2024cv00416
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Holliday
Defendant:
Madera County Sheriff Office Jail Division
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Felipe Cabrera-Huato v. USP Lompoc Warden
as 2:2024cv02892
Petitioner:
Felipe Cabrera-Huato
Respondent:
USP Lompoc Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
(PC) Hill v. CDC
as 2:2024cv01607
Plaintiff:
Derrick Hill
Defendant:
California Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Stolze v. Tuolumne County Jail
as 2:2024cv01594
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn M. Stolze
Defendant:
Tuolumne County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Colusa County Superior Court
as 2:2024cv01602
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Colusa County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ledezma v. Hill
as 5:2024cv03393
Petitioner:
Joe Ledezma
Respondent:
James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03369
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03380
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
