Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Don Swearingen et al v. Stacey Long et al
as 8:2022cv00830
Plaintiff:
Don Swearingen, DWayne Baird, Carla Ethier and others
Defendant:
Stacey Long and Healthcare Billing Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Gaj v. Wynn et al
as 2:2019cv00505
Defendant:
Stephen Cootey, Patricia Mulroy, Kimmarie Sinatra and others
Nominal Defendant:
Wynn Resorts, Ltd.
Plaintiff:
Dustin Gaj
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chahal v. Lonergan et al
as 5:2017cv01036
Plaintiff:
Gurbaksh Chahal
Defendant:
Bill Lonergan, David Silverman, Mark Lotke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Weinfeld et al v. Minor et al
as 3:2014cv00513
Plaintiff:
Hannah Cohen, Congregation Beth Joseph, Colonel Robert Frank and others
Defendant:
Walter A. Marting, Jr., Bill L. Minor, Precious Minerals Mining and Refining Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Bela Vidor v. American International Group,, et al
as 11-16828
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BELA (BILL) VIDOR
Defendant - Appellee:
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC. and ROBERT "STEVE" MILLER, Chairman of the Board of Directors
Vidor v. American International Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00315
Plaintiff:
Bela (Bill) Vidor
Defendant:
American International Group, Inc. and Robert "Steve" Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In re Petco Animal Supplies Inc. Shareholder Litigation
as 3:2007cv00602
Plaintiff:
Bill J Harris and Bill J Harris
Defendant:
Petco Animal Supplies, Inc., Brian K Devine, James M Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Nach v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2007cv00740
Plaintiff:
Marvin W. Nach, Marvin W. Nach, Marvin W. Nach and others
Defendant:
Gerald Baldwin, Gerald Baldwin, Hilary Billings and others
Miscellaneou:
Peet's Coffee & Tea and Peet's Coffee & Tea
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
