Other Contract Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Lacambacal v. Vasquez et al
as 2:2024cv01759
Defendant: Desteney Vasquez doing business as Q Automotive and Fernando doing business as Q Auto/Automotive
Plaintiff: Lloyd Lacambacal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Policy No. FAL-2000527 v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01299
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Policy No. FAL-2000527
Defendant: Expeditors International of Washington, Inc., CDN Logistics, Inc., Mobile Air, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Policy No. FAL-2000527 et al v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv01151
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to Policy No. FAL-2000527 and Verkada, Inc.
Defendant: Expeditors International of Washington, Inc., Fastmore Logistics, LLC, TA Trucking and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Lloyd et al v. Journal of Wildlife Photography, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2024cv00007
Plaintiff: Jared Lloyd and Jared Lloyd Photography, LLC
Defendant: Journal of Wildlife Photography, LLC and JayMoe, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
DexCom, Inc. et al v. Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv10655
Plaintiff: DexCom, Inc., CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NO. MC-1000283 and Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's Subscribing to Policy No. MC-1000283
Defendant: Expeditors International of Washington, Inc., United Airlines, Inc., Does ONE through TEN and others
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 81 Damaged Goods While Being Transported
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London v. STG Logistics, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv06927
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds of London
Defendant: STG Logistics, Inc., XPO Logistics Freight, Inc., CTS Global Supply Chain Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Zack Porter et al v. Rhea Brothers, G.P. et al
as 8:2023cv00933
Plaintiff: Zack Porter
Petitioner: DEHY ALFALFA MILLS, INC.
Defendant: RHEA BROTHERS, G.P., a Nebraska entity, RHEA BROTHERS, LLC, RHEA CATTLE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Underwriters at Lloyds Insuring Western Digital Technologies, Inc. Under Policy Number FAL-2000055 et al., v. Flexport International, LLC
as 3:2023cv02268
Plaintiff: UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS INSURING WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. UNDER POLICY NUMBER FAL-2000055, and WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,, Underwriters at Lloyds Insuring Western Digital Technologies, Inc. Under Policy Number FAL-2000055 and Western Digital Technologies, Inc.
Defendant: FLEXPORT INTERNATIONAL, LLC, and Flexport International, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's Subscribing to Policy No. 10000525 v. Hugo Leonidas Estrada Torres et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv02826
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's Subscribing to Policy No. 10000525
Defendant: Hugo Leonidas Estrada Torres dba E Logistics, Does One through Ten and Hugo Leonidas Estrada Torres doing business as E Logistics
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London, Subscribing to Policy No. 311227619AA v. DFM Trucking LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01309
Plaintiff: Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, London, Subscribing to Policy No. 311227619AA
Defendant: DFM Trucking LLC and Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?