Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Cox v. United States of America
as 2:2017cv00121
Plaintiff:
Shawna Cox
Defendant:
John Does 1-100 and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Hughes v. Hinesly et al
as 2:2016cv00005
Plaintiff:
Lewis Vincent Hughes and Dean A Arp
Defendant:
William Raymond Hinesly, Wei Yang, Darin Silva and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Goldmanis et al v. Insinger et al
as 2:2013cv02035
Plaintiff:
Sven Goldmanis and Linda Insinger
Defendant:
John Insinger, Robert Insinger, Susan Insinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Property Reserve, Inc. v. Wasson et al
as 1:2012cv00649
Plaintiff:
Property Reserve, Inc.
Defendant:
Dawn K. Wasson , John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
Johnson et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2011cv00042
Plaintiff:
Curtis W. Johnson and Carol Z. Johnson
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. , BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cariaga et al v. Bank of America et al
as 1:2010cv00709
Plaintiff:
Lily Anna Cariaga and Georgette Kailiawa
Defendant:
Bank of America, Bank of America, N.A. , BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
State of Hawaii by its Attorne v. Steve's Ag Services, Ltd., et al
as 09-17816
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STATE OF HAWAII BY ITS ATTORNEY GENERAL
Defendant - Appellant:
STEVE'S AG SERVICES, LTD., a Hawaii corporation, STEVEN BACZKIEWICZ, CONTRACT MILLING and others
Defendant:
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY, YEE HOP, LIMITED, JOHN DOE 1-100 and others
State of Hawaii by its Attorney General v. Nature Conservancy, The et al
as 1:2007cv00516
Plaintiff:
State of Hawaii by its Attorney General
Defendant:
Nature Conservancy, The, Yee Hop, Limited, John Doe 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Petition to Quiet Title
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
