Cases 1 - 10 of 13
In re: Uber Technologies, Inc., Passenger Sexual Assault Litigation
as 3:2023md03084
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe LSA 340, Katherine Hylin, E. R. and others
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Raiser, LLC, Raiser-CA, LLC and others
Petitioner:
Bret Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
F-3 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03951
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe F-3
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Jane Doe F-2 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03949
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe F-2
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
F-1 v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv03945
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe F-1
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Mary F.Hannan v. Lillian A. Korber et al
as 8:2020cv02144
Defendant:
Kerry L. Korber, Justin S. Korber, Timothy E. Korber and others
Plaintiff:
Mary F. Hannan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Oshima v. Bennet, et al
as 3:2016cv05451
Plaintiff:
Yasuhito Brandon Oshima
Defendant:
John F. Bennet and Federal Bureau of Investigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Henry F. Lewis v. PNC Bank, N.A.
as 2:2013cv07174
Plaintiff:
Henry F. Lewis
Defendant:
PNC Bank, N.A.
D Brian F Bartolome v. Irvine Chilis
as 8:2010cv00493
Plaintiff:
D Brian F Bartolome
Defendant:
Irvine Chilis
Hutchens v. United States of America
as 2:2010cv00232
Plaintiff:
John F. Hutchens
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Taylor v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
as 1:2008cv01631
Plaintiff:
Kirell F. Taylor
Defendant:
Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation
Intervenor:
Sovereign Kirell Francis Bettis Foreign State
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
