Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Motekaitis et al v. USI Insurance Services National, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00885
Plaintiff:
Paul Motekaitis and Carri Mangelli Kneass
Defendant:
USI Insurance Services National, Inc., James D. Kane and Karen Mondshine
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Campbell v. Las Vegas Metro Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv00944
Plaintiff:
Karen L. Campbell
Defendant:
Las Vegas Metro Police Department, City of Las Vegas, Joe Lombardo and others
Meiller v. Frederick, et al.
as 1:2021cv00297
Plaintiff:
Brandie Meiller
Defendant:
Ladeene Bedford Frederick, David P Hamilton, Karen Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Civil et al
as 2:2019cv05688
Plaintiff:
TuWanna Thompson
Defendant:
Christian Emiliano, Karen Civil, karencivil.com and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thompson v. Civil et al
as 2:2019cv05689
Plaintiff:
TuWanna Thompson
Defendant:
Christian Emiliano, Karen Civil, karencivil.com and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TuWanna Thompson v. Karen Civil et al
as 2:2019cv05690
Plaintiff:
TuWanna Thompson
Defendant:
Christian Emiliano, karencivil.com, Karen Civil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chenhui Luo v. Kaiyan Shan
as 2:2018cv08883
Plaintiff:
Chenhui Luo
Defendant:
Kaiyin Shan, Karen Shan, Chen Xiao and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Karen Arveson v. Montana DHHS, et al
as 16-35618
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREN ARVESON
Defendant - Appellee:
MONTANA DHHS, ANN SHEEHY YEGEN and GLENDIVE CPS
Arveson v. Montana DHHS et al
as 1:2016cv00038
Plaintiff:
Karen Arveson
Defendant:
Montana DHHS, Ann Sheehy Yegen and Glendive CPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
United Tactical Systems, LLC et al v. Christopher Edwards
as 2:2016cv00416
Plaintiff:
Karen Buchholz and United Tactical Systems, LLC
Defendant:
Christopher Edwards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
