Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Jeanne Michaels v. Taco Bell Corporation
as 13-35448
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JEANNE MICHAELS, an individual
Defendant - Appellant:
TACO BELL CORPORATION, a California corporation
Joel Steed v. National Football League et al
as 2:2012cv00524
Defendant:
All American Sports Corporation, Does, EB Sports Corp and others
Plaintiff:
Joel Steed
Rolain v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv01900
Defendant:
Eastern Beltway, Ltd. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Unknown:
Josh Cole Aicklen and Stephen L. Titzer
Plaintiff:
Ida Belle Rolain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
NOT USED
as 2:2011cv01899
Defendant:
Eastern Beltway, Ltd. and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ida Belle Rolain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
McCluskey et al v. Allied Packing & Supply, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv05152
Plaintiff:
Gary McCluskey and Carol McCluskey
Defendant:
Allied Packing & Supply, Inc., AGFA Corporation, Anacomp, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
McCluskey et al v. Allied Packing & Supply, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv05152
Plaintiff:
Gary McCluskey and Carol McCluskey
Defendant:
Allied Packing & Supply, Inc., AGFA Corporation, Anacomp, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michaels v. Taco Bell Corporation
as 3:2010cv01051
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Michaels
Defendant:
Taco Bell Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Yong Huang v. Tim Bell, et al
as 10-16321
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YONG TAN HUANG
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM BELL and GAYLE BELL
Yong Huang v. Tim Bell, et al
as 10-16322
Plaintiff - Appellant:
YONG TAN HUANG
Defendant - Appellee:
TIM BELL, GAYLE BELL, CONRAD RUSHING and others
Huang v. Bell et al
as 5:2010cv01640
Plaintiff:
Yong Tan Huang
Defendant:
Tim Bell, Gayle Bell, Conrad Rushing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
