Asbestos Personal Injury Product Liability Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Eschenbacher v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 4:2017cv00077
Plaintiff: Curtis R. Eschenbacher
Defendant: BNSF Railway Company , John Swing , Robinson Insulation Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Christopher Curtis v. Eaton Corporation
as 13-56977
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER C. CURTIS, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Charles C. Curtis
Defendant - Appellee: EATON CORPORATION, as successor in interest to Cutler Hammer
Christopher Curtis v. Schneider Electric USA, Inc.
as 13-56978
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER C. CURTIS, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Charles C. Curtis
Defendant - Appellee: SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC., FKA Square D. Company
Christopher Curtis v. ABB Incorporated We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-56976
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER C. CURTIS, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Charles C. Curtis
Defendant - Appellee: ABB INCORPORATED, individually and as successor in interest to ITE Imperial Co., FKA ITE Circuit Breaker Company
Christopher Curtis v. Schneider Electric USA, Inc.
as 13-56416
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER C. CURTIS, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Charles C. Curtis
Defendant - Appellee: SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC USA, INC., FKA Square D. Company
Christopher Curtis v. ABB Incorporated
as 13-56413
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER C. CURTIS, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Charles C. Curtis
Defendant - Appellee: ABB INCORPORATED, individually and as successor in interest to ITE Imperial Co., FKA ITE Circuit Breaker Company
Christopher Curtis v. Eaton Corporation
as 13-56417
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHRISTOPHER C. CURTIS, individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Charles C. Curtis
Defendant - Appellee: EATON CORPORATION, as successor in interest to Cutler Hammer
Ralston et al v. Crane Company et al
as 1:2013cv00033
Plaintiff: Wanda J. Ralston and Curtis B. Ralston
Defendant: Crane Company , Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Atwood & Morrill and others
Cross_claimant: ITT Corporation and Goulds Pumps, Inc.
Cross_defendant: Air & Liquid Systems Corporation , Atwood & Morrill , Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Charles C Curtis v. Abb Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02014
Defendant: Abb Inc, American Insulated Wire Corporation, Borg Warner Morse Tec Inc and others
Plaintiff: Charles C Curtis
Unknown: Thomas Jeffrey Moses
Sunsoon Doucet v. Asbestos Corporation Ltd et al
as 2:2011cv05845
Defendant: Asbestos Corporation Ltd, Curtis Wright Corporation, Dexter-Hysol Aerospace Inc and others
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Adel Clamp: Buffalo Pumps Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Mundet Cork Corporation: Crown Cork and Seal Company Inc
Plaintiff: Sunsoon Doucet
Ued Individually And As Successor To Allied Signal Inc Successor To Bendix Corporation: Honeywell International Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To B F Sturtevant: Howden Buffalo Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To De Lval Steam Turbine Inc: IMO Industries Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest And By Merger To Western Fibrous Glass Products Compa: Quintec Industries Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Pratt And Whitney: United Technologies Corporation
Ued Individually And As Successor By Merger To CBS Corporation: Viacom Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Griscom-Russell And The Dial Corporation: Viad Corp
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Quimby Pump Company: Warren Pumps LLC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?