Cases 51 - 60 of 86
Robert Pepper, et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 14-15000
:
In re: APPLE IPHONE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT PEPPER, STEPHEN H. SCHWARTZ, EDWARD W. HAYTER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
APPLE, INC.
Zack Ward, et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 12-17805
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ZACK WARD and THOMAS BUCHAR, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
APPLE, INC.
Ward et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2012cv05404
Plaintiff:
Zack Ward and Thomas Buchar
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 Antitrust Litigation
Terrell et al v. Apple Inc.
as 3:2012cv00259
Plaintiff:
Eric Terrell , James Blackwell and Crystal Boykin
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Nolan v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 4:2011cv06647
Plaintiff:
Amy D. Nolan
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., Hachette Book Group, Inc., HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Horowitz v. Apple Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv05538
Plaintiff:
Susan Horowitz
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Hatchette Book Group, Inc., HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Petru et al v. Apple, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv03892
Plaintiff:
Anthony Petru and Marcus Mathis
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., Hachette Book Group, Inc., HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. and others
Miscellaneou:
Patsy Diamond
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Rivers v. MacMillan et al
as 3:2011cv05080
Plaintiff:
Steven Rivers
Defendant:
MacMillan, Simon & Schuster, Hachette Book Group and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Miller et al v. Hachette Book Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv05019
Plaintiff:
Chad Miller and Grace Hoke
Defendant:
Hachette Book Group, Inc., Harper Collins Publishers, Inc. , Macmillan Publishers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Key v. Apple Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv04754
Plaintiff:
Katrina Key
Defendant:
Apple Inc., Hachette Book Group, HarperCollins Publishers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.