Antitrust Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Lancaster et al v. Headway Technologies, Inc. et al
as 5:2019cv08122
Plaintiff: Kimberly Benjamin, Dustin Lancaster, Samuel Bringhurst and others
Defendant: NHK International Corporation, NHK Spring Co., Ltd., TDK Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
In re: Hard Disk Drive Suspension Assemblies Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2019md02918
Defendant: Headway Technologies, Inc., NHK Spring (Thailand) Co., Ltd., NHK Spring Co., Ltd. and others
Plaintiff: John R. Shannon III, Christopher Rinehart, Alex Nicholson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Stephen Stetson, et al v. West Publishing Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-56313
Plaintiff - Appellant: STEPHEN STETSON, an individual and all others similarly situated, SHANE LAVIGNE, individual and all others similarly situated, CHRISTINE LEIGH BROWN-ROBERTS, individual and all others similary situated and others
Objector - Appellee: SETH BRYANT GRISSOM, JAMES RALPH GARRISON, III, DUSTIN KENNEMER and others
Defendant - Appellee: WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION, a Minnesota Corporation doing business as BAR/BRI and KAPLAN, INC.
Stephen Stetson, et al v. West Publishing Corporation, et al
as 13-57159
Plaintiff - Appellant: STEPHEN STETSON, individual and all others similarly situated, SHANE LAVIGNE, individual and all others similarly situated, CHRISTINE LEIGH BROWN-ROBERTS, individual and all others similarly situated and others
Objector - Appellee: SETH BRYANT GRISSOM, JAMES RALPH GARRISON, III, DUSTIN KENNEMER and others
Defendant - Appellee: WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION, a Minnesota Corporation, DBA BAR/BRI
Defendant: KAPLAN, INC.
Stephen Stetson, et al v. West Publishing Corporation, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-57061
Plaintiff - Appellee: STEPHEN STETSON, individual and all others similarly situated, SHANE LAVIGNE, individual and all others similarly situated, CHRISTINE LEIGH BROWN-ROBERTS, individual and all others similarly situated and others
Objector - Appellant: SETH BRYANT GRISSOM, JAMES RALPH GARRISON, III, DUSTIN KENNEMER and others
Defendant - Appellee: WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION, a Minnesota Corporation, DBA BAR/BRI
Defendant: KAPLAN, INC.
The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o et al v. Toshiba Corporation et al
as 3:2012cv05230
Plaintiff: The State of California by its Attorney General Kamala D. Harris and the City and County of San Francisco Ex Rel Dennis J. Herrera, The County of Santa Clara, and Los Angeles Unified School District o , The State of Arizona by its Attorney GeneralTom Horne , The State of Arkansas by its Attorney General Dustin McDaniel and others
Defendant: Toshiba Corporation and Toshiba America Electronic Components, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Van Dyk v. Cypress Semiconductor Corporation et al
as 4:2007cv01629
Plaintiff: Dustin Van Dyk, Dustin Van Dyk and Dustin Van Dyk
Defendant: Cypress Semiconductor Corporation, Fujitsu America, Inc., Fujitsu Limited, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Static Random Access Memory (SRAM) Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2007md01819
Plaintiff: Michael Brooks, Rhonda L. Jacobs, Sharon Defren and others
Defendant: Renesas Technology America, Inc., Epson America, Inc., NEC Electronics Corporation and others
Not Yet Classified: Kyocera Wireless Corporation, Smart Modular Technologies, Inc., Extreme Networks, Inc. and others
Intervenor: David Bratton, Communication Mega-Sat Inc., Bryar Law Corporation and others
Interested Party: James B Wright and Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Special Master: Judge (Ret.) Fern M Smith and Martin Quinn
Consolidated Plaintiff: Robin McEntee
In Re: Static Random Access Memory (SRAM)
Other: Barbara Cochran
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?