Antitrust Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Kroger Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2024cv00347
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission, State of Arizona, State of California and others
Defendant: Kroger Company and Albertsons Companies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Federal Trade Commission et al v. John Muir Health et al
as 5:2023cv05952
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission and State of California
Defendant: John Muir Health and Tenet Healthcare Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
JMCG Systems International LLC et al v. Department of Justice of California et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv05990
Plaintiff: JMCG Systems International LLC and John-Michael Gutierrez
Defendant: Department of Justice of California, Governor's Office of California and State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2021md02981
Defendant: Alphabet Inc., Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Plaintiff: Jared Stark, Ashly Esquivel, Robert Wing and others
Counter Defendant: Epic Games, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Humor Rainbow, Inc.
Counter Claimant: Google LLC and Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited
Not Classified By Court: Activision Blizzard, Inc., Niantic, Inc., Big Fish Games and others
Amicus Curiae: American Antitrust Institute and Economists Supporting Dr. Rysman as Proposed Amici
3Rd Party Defendant: Riot Games, Inc.
Interested Party: Valve Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc., Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Petitioner: Amazon.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
as 21-16695
Plaintiff: EPIC GAMES, INC.
Counter Claimant: APPLE, INC.
Amicus Curiae: TILE, MATCH GROUP, INC., BASECAMP and others
Letricia Brown v. State of California, et al
as 23-55813
Plaintiff / Appellant: LETRICIA LAVERN BROWN, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, TORRANCE MEMORIAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Letricia Lavern Brown v. The State of California et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv01966
Plaintiff: Letricia Lavern Brown
Defendant: SOUTH CENTRAL LOS ANGELES REGIONAL CENTER FOR DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED PERSONS, INC., erroneously sued herein as LOS ANGELES REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER, The State of California, County of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv04325
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Defendant: Meta Platforms Inc.,, Within Unlimited, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg and others
Interested Party: Apple Inc., Alphabet Inc., Nike, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae: State of New York, State of Alaska, State of California and others
Not Classified By Court: ByteDance Inc., Valve Corporation, HTC America, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Forte Nexus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
In re California Gasoline Spot Market Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv03131
Plaintiff: Pacific Wine Distributors, Inc., Bogard Construction, Inc., Vincent Cendejas and others
Defendant: SK Trading International Co. Ltd., SK Energy Americas, Inc., Vitol Inc. and others
Interested Party: Craig Kelly, Carpe Carma, LLC, Marie E. Richardson and others
Not Classified By Court: The People of the State of California, All Parties, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Epic Games, Inc. v. Apple, Inc.
as 21-16506
Appellant: EPIC GAMES, INC.
Counter Claimant: APPLE, INC.
Amicus Curiae: 38 LAW, ECONOMICS, AND BUSINESS PROFESSORS, TILE, COMMITTEE TO SUPPORT THE ANTITRUST LAWS and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?