Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 145
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas et al
as 2:2023cv10203
Plaintiff: Cecil Elmore
Defendant: Ruben Islas, Marth Enriquez, Jules Arthur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gold v. US Bancorp et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01342
Plaintiff: Michelle Gold, The Gold Family Trust, Star Martinez and others
Defendant: J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, RBS Acceptance Inc., RBS Financial Prodcuts Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Civil Remedies: Racketeering (RICO) Act
Tri Huynh v. Walmart, Inc., et al
as 22-16188
Plaintiff / Appellant: TRI MINH HUYNH
Defendant / Appellee: WALMART, INC., A Delaware corporation, DOUG MCMILLON, BRETT BIGGS and others
Defendant: WAL-MART.COM USA LLC, RACHEL BRAND, GREGORY B. PENNER and others
Myong Oh v. Reconstrust Company, NA, et al
as 22-55711
Plaintiff / Appellant: MYONG SUK OH, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: RECONSTRUST COMPANY, NA, a US corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP., an American worldwide banking and financial service holding company commonly known as BNY Mellon, MTC FINANCIAL, INC., a California corporation, DBA Trustee Corps and others
Aiwohi et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00312
Plaintiff: Nathan Earl Aiwohi, Toby Alamoana Keohokapu, Darlene K. Ebos and others
Defendant: Bank of America, N.A. and The Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Teri Sahm v. Onslow Bay Financial LLC, et al
as 22-35319
Plaintiff / Appellant: TERI KEALOHA SAHM and TERI SAHM
Defendant / Appellee: ONSLOW BAY FINANCIAL LLC, SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC., OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, INC., DBA PHH Mortgage and others
Song Pae, et al v. ReconTrust Company, N.A., et al
as 22-55407
Plaintiff / Appellant: SONG PAE, SANG OK PAE, a man and wife, MEESON PAE YANG, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellee: RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., a U.S. corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP., commonly known as BNY Mellon, an American worldwide banking and financial service holding company, SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, FKA Safeguard Properties, LLC and others
Song Pae, et al v. ReconTrust Company, N.A., et al
as 22-55373
Plaintiff / Appellant: SONG PAE, SANG OK PAE, a man and wife, MEESON PAE YANG, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellee: RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., a U.S. corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP., commonly known as BNY Mellon, an American worldwide banking and financial service holding company, SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, FKA Safeguard Properties, LLC and others
Song Pae, et al v. ReconTrust Company, N.A., et al
as 22-55375
Plaintiff / Appellant: SONG PAE, SANG OK PAE, a man and wife, MEESON PAE YANG, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellee: RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., a U.S. corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP., commonly known as BNY Mellon, an American worldwide banking and financial service holding company, SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, FKA Safeguard Properties, LLC and others
Myong Oh v. Reconstrust Company, NA, et al
as 22-55245
Plaintiff / Appellant: MYONG SUK OH, an individual
Defendant / Appellee: RECONSTRUST COMPANY, NA, a US corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP., an American worldwide banking and financial service holding company commonly known as BNY Mellon, MTC FINANCIAL, INC., a California corporation doing business as Trustee Corps and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?