Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Franklin County Career and Technology Center v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv02200
Plaintiff:
Franklin County Career and Technology Center
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Facebook Holdings, LLC, Facebook Operations, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Beauregard Parish Police Jury et al v. McKinsey Holdings, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07278
Plaintiff:
Beauregard Parish Police Jury, Bossier Parish, Caddo Parish and others
Defendant:
McKinsey Holdings, Inc., McKinsey & Company, Inc. United States, McKinsey & Company, Inc. Washington D.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Franklin County Career and Technology Center v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv07252
Plaintiff:
Franklin County Career and Technology Center
Defendant:
Juul Labs Inc., Altria Group Inc., Altria Client Services LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Beaufort County, North Carolina et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv07172
Plaintiff:
Beaufort County, North Carolina, Bertie County, North Carolina, Bladen County, North Carolina and others
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Franklin, NH, City of et al v. McKinsey and Company, Inc.
as 3:2022cv06608
Plaintiff:
Franklin, NH, City of, Laconia, NH, City of and Derry, NH, Town of
Defendant:
McKinsey and Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Nolte v. Franklin Jr. et al
as 4:2020cv05585
Defendant:
Susan G. Smith, Savannah Gomes, Marlene Adam and others
Plaintiff:
Regina L. Nolte
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Leo Cono v. William Barr et al
as 2:2020cv02656
Plaintiff:
Leo Cono and Cono
Defendant:
Kathy Moralez, Madelyne Bloom, John Desheplo and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Armin Abazari et al v. United States Department of Education et al
as 8:2019cv01290
Defendant:
Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, Navient Solutions, LLC,, American Podiatric Medical Association and others
Plaintiff:
Armin Abazari
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Patrick Joseph Soria et al
as 2:2018cv03041
Defendant:
George Wesley Pierce, Jr., Rebekah Brown, Westwood Legal and others
Plaintiff:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for The Holders of the First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust 2006-FF10 Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-FF10
Receiver:
Robb Evans & Associates LLC, Temporary Receiver and Robb Evans and Associates LLC
Interested Party:
Robert West, Morgan Picks Two LLC, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustee Formerly Known as Bankers Trust Company of California, N.A., Not in its Individual Capacity but Solely as Trustee, or its Permitted Successors and Assig and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Marina Ivanoff
Intervenor:
Selene Finance, Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, Select Portfolio Services, LLC and others
Intervenor Defendant:
All Persons Unknown Claiming any Legal or Equitable Right, Title, Estate, Lien or Interest in The Subject Property Located at 390 South Sepulveda Boulevard Unit 208, Los Angeles, California 90049, APN, Kimberly L Yamada-Tung, Christina Gifford and others
Petitioner:
Garson Silvers, DNE Associates, a CA general partnership, The Bank of New York Mellon fka The Bank of New York as Trustee for the Certificateholders CWMBS, Inc CHL Mortgage Pass-Through Trust 2005-HYB4, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2005-HYB4 and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Century 21 Citrus Realty and Albert Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bunnett & Company, Inc. et al v. J.D. Heiskell & Company, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv01475
Plaintiff:
Bunnett & Company, Inc. and Energy Feeds International, LLC
Defendant:
J.D. Heiskell & Company, Inc. , Todd Gearheart , E&K AG, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
