Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Amber Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al
as 2:2023cv06439
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Doneyda Perez v. DIRECTV, LLC, et al
as 23-55131
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DONEYDA PEREZ, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
DIRECTV, LLC, a Delaware Corporation and SIGNAL AUDITING, INC., a New York Corporation
Defendant / Appellant:
LONSTEIN LAW OFFICES, P.C., a New York Professional Corporation, JULIE COHEN LONSTEIN and WAYNE M. LONSTEIN
Corbrus, LLC v. Omnia Group, Ltd., et al
as 22-55916
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CORBRUS, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Defendant / Appellant:
OMNIA GROUP, LTD., a New York company, OMNIA PROPERTIES, LLC, a New York limited liability company and DAVID PAZ, an individual
Defendant:
JEFFER MANGLES BUTLER AND MITCHELL LLP, a California Limited Liability Partnership, CATHERINE DEBONO HOLMES, an individual, SETH JAMES PARDEE, an individual and others
It's My Seat, Inc., et al v. EIN Cap, Inc, et al
as 22-55843
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IT'S MY SEAT, INC., a California Corporation and VAHE SHAHINIAN, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
HARTFORD CAPITAL, LLC, a Limited Liability Company, KEVIN WOODLEY, an individual, EIN CAP, INC., a New York Corporation and others
Myong Oh v. Reconstrust Company, NA, et al
as 22-55711
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MYONG SUK OH, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
RECONSTRUST COMPANY, NA, a US corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP., an American worldwide banking and financial service holding company commonly known as BNY Mellon, MTC FINANCIAL, INC., a California corporation, DBA Trustee Corps and others
Rune Kraft v. Chevron Corporation, et al
as 22-16087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUNE KRAFT
Defendant / Appellee:
CHEVRON CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation, VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SYSTEMS, INC., a California corporation, VALLEY PACIFIC PETROLEUM SERVICES, INC., a California corporation and others
Aiwohi et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2022cv00312
Plaintiff:
Nathan Earl Aiwohi, Toby Alamoana Keohokapu, Darlene K. Ebos and others
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A. and The Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Song Pae, et al v. ReconTrust Company, N.A., et al
as 22-55407
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SONG PAE, SANG OK PAE, a man and wife, MEESON PAE YANG, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., a U.S. corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP., commonly known as BNY Mellon, an American worldwide banking and financial service holding company, SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, FKA Safeguard Properties, LLC and others
Song Pae, et al v. ReconTrust Company, N.A., et al
as 22-55373
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SONG PAE, SANG OK PAE, a man and wife, MEESON PAE YANG, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., a U.S. corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP., commonly known as BNY Mellon, an American worldwide banking and financial service holding company, SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, FKA Safeguard Properties, LLC and others
Song Pae, et al v. ReconTrust Company, N.A., et al
as 22-55375
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SONG PAE, SANG OK PAE, a man and wife, MEESON PAE YANG, an individual and others
Defendant / Appellee:
RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., a U.S. corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of Bank of America Corporation, BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP., commonly known as BNY Mellon, an American worldwide banking and financial service holding company, SAFEGUARD PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, FKA Safeguard Properties, LLC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
