Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Recinos v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2023cv06086
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Recinos
Defendant:
Washington State, Pierce County Superior Court, US District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Bruce Gambill, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 12-36071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE E. GAMBILL, Jr.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Gambill v. UNITED STATES et al
as 3:2012cv06004
Plaintiff:
Bruce E. Gambill, Jr.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES and State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Snyder v. State of Washington et al
as 3:2010cv05286
Plaintiff:
Brian N. Snyder
Defendant:
State of Washington, Department of Natural Resources, Peter Goldmark and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Eugene Beauregard, et al v. John Hillock, et al
as 09-36090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE BEAUREGARD and SUSAN BEAUREGARD, and the marital community composed thereof
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN HILLOCK, SANDRA HILLOCK, and the marital community composed thereof, EDWARD MERRILL and others
Beauregard et al v. Hillock et al
as 2:2009cv01614
Plaintiff:
Eugene Beauregard, Susan Beauregard and Sandra Hillock
Defendant:
John Hillock, Edward Merrill, Wanda Merrill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Dellelo v. Hoover et al
as 2:2009cv01396
Plaintiff:
Patrick Wayne Dellelo
Defendant:
Shellee Kae Hoover, Nancy Ann Vaade, Charles Richard Vaade and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
JM Martinac Shipbuilding Corpo v. State of Washington, et al
as 08-35754
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JM MARTINAC SHIPBUILDING CORPORATION, a Washington Corporation
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF WASHINGTON, by and through its Department of Transporation, DOUGLAS B. MACDONALD, Secretary of Transportation, in his individual capacity, W. MICHAEL ANDERSON, Acting Assistant Secretary and Executive Director, WSF, in his individual capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
