Cases 111 - 120 of 5,993
Jameson LaForest v. United States of America
as 8:2023cv00265
Petitioner:
Jameson LaForest
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Thrower v. USA
as 4:2023cv01645
Petitioner:
Vernell Thrower
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(HC) Cea v. USA (2255- 2:19-cr-0126 TLN)
as 2:2023cv00607
Petitioner:
Jaziz Cea
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Israel Maldonado v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00304
Petitioner:
Israel Maldonado
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Malik Lamont Powell v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00832
Petitioner:
Malik Lamont Powell
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
(HC) Carter v. USA (2255- 2:18-cr-00255-WBS-1)
as 2:2023cv00482
Petitioner:
Jaquorey Rashawn Carter
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Arno Abramian v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00249
Petitioner:
Arno Abramian
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Corey v. USA
as 3:2023cv00986
Plaintiff:
Joseph Albert Corey
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Richard Ayvazyan v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv08915
Petitioner:
Richard Ayvazyan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Gerrans v. USA
as 3:2023cv00801
Petitioner:
Lawrence J. Gerrans
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
