General Cases filed in Oregon
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Jacobs v. Kelly We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2019cv00342
Respondent: Brandon Kelly
Petitioner: Shayne Martin Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Romero v. Cain
as 2:2017cv00660
Respondent: Brad Cain
Petitioner: Martin Romero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nelson v. Nooth
as 2:2016cv00756
Petitioner: Cleveland Dante Nelson
Respondent: Martin Nooth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Premo
as 6:2015cv01783
Petitioner: Martin Allen Johnson
Respondent: Warden Premo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Premo
as 6:2014cv00712
Petitioner: Martin Allen Johnson
Respondent: Jeff Premo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez-Ramirez v. Nooth
as 1:2010cv01292
Respondent: Mark Nooth
Petitioner: Jorge Fray Martin Perez-Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez-Ramirez v. Nooth
as 1:2010cv01294
Respondent: Mark Nooth
Petitioner: Jorge Fray Martin Perez-Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Mills
as 3:2007cv01518
Petitioner: Chris Martin
Respondent: Don Mills
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Romero v. Hill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2007cv00917
Petitioner: Martin Romero
Respondent: Jean Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rivers v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2007cv00868
Petitioner: Martin Everett Rivers
Respondent: State of Oregon, Fourth Judicial Distric Judges, Michael Schrunk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?