Cases 11 - 20 of 82
Richard v. Gentry et al
as 2:2018cv00181
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Marvin D Richard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vazquez v. Gentry et al
as 2:2018cv00117
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Jorge Vazquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Houe v. Gentry
as 2:2017cv03093
Respondent:
Warden Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Raymond Houe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jamaar Williams v. Jo Gentry, et al
as 17-17442
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMAAR JEROME WILLIAMS
Respondent - Appellee:
JO GENTRY, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Vignolo v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv02976
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada, Jo Gentry and State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Leonard D Vignolo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alisha Murphy v. Amanda Gentry
as 17-35944
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALISHA ANN MURPHY
Respondent - Appellee:
AMANDA GENTRY
Steven Scott v. Attorney General for the State, et al
as 17-17312
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN L. SCOTT
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and JO GENTRY, Warden
Hernandez v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv02826
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Robert Michael Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Moe v. Jo Gentry, et al
as 17-17204
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN MOE
Respondent - Appellee:
JO GENTRY, Warden, Substituted for Brian E. Williams, Sr. and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Mendez-Soto v. Gentry et al
as 2:2017cv02640
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Jo Gentry
Petitioner:
Rafael Mendez-Soto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
