Cases 31 - 40 of 205
Eric Orduna v. Tim Garrett, et al
as 23-15313
Petitioner / Appellant:
ERIC ORDUNA
Respondent / Appellee:
TIM GARRETT and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Smith v. State of Washington
as 3:2023cv05142
Petitioner:
John Garrett Smith
Respondent:
State of Washington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. State of Nevada, et al
as 3:2023cv00076
Petitioner:
Gene Allen
Respondent:
State of Nevada, Tim Garrett and A.G. Aaron Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaw v. Garrett et al
as 3:2023cv00063
Petitioner:
William Shaw
Respondent:
Tim Garrett and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ryan Anthony v. Garrett Laney
as 23-35030
Petitioner / Appellant:
RYAN LAWRENCE ANTHONY
Respondent / Appellee:
GARRETT LANEY
Russell Ros v. Garrett Laney
as 23-35000
Petitioner / Appellant:
RUSSELL ROS
Respondent / Appellee:
GARRETT LANEY, Superintendent, Two Rivers Correctional Institution
Smith v. Thrasher
as 3:2023cv05013
Petitioner:
John Garrett Smith
Respondent:
Thrasher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Camacho v. Garrett et al
as 3:2023cv00001
Petitioner:
Ciro Camacho
Respondent:
Tiim Garrett, Nevada Attorney General and Tim Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Valencia v. Garrett et al
as 3:2022cv00554
Petitioner:
Ignacio Valencia
Respondent:
Garrett and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitener v. Garrett et al
as 3:2022cv00528
Petitioner:
Ace V Whitener
Respondent:
Tim Garrett and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
