Cases 181 - 190 of 47,391
Deshone M. Lacey Jr. v. M. Felts et al
as 8:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
Deshone M. Lacey Jr.
Defendant:
M. Felts, Don Barnes, K. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bennett v. Parales et al
as 2:2024cv01367
Plaintiff:
Mario Bennett
Defendant:
Parales and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) Reif v. Gray et al
as 2:2024cv01346
Plaintiff:
Daniel John Reif
Defendant:
Ryan Gray, Sabrina Buis, Todd Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Lira v. Kia Automotive Motors, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01360
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Gavino Lira
Defendant:
Kia Automotive Motors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Montgomery v. People of the State of California et al
as 2:2024cv01348
Plaintiff:
Jonlynn S. Montgomery
Defendant:
People of the State of California, Superior Court of California, Sacramento County, William R. Ridgeway, Justice Center Probate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Thomas Ruiz v. G. Sanchez Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv03897
Plaintiff:
James Thomas Ruiz
Defendant:
G. Sanchez, Jr., Zunaga, Crosby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Daniel Harper v. C. Chatman
as 2:2024cv03902
Plaintiff:
Daniel James Harper
Defendant:
C Chatman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Choate v. Kings County Superior Court et al
as 1:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
George Graham Choate
Defendant:
Kings County Superior Court and Fandy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Daniel v. Nelson et al
as 2:2024cv01358
Plaintiff:
Dajon Daniel
Defendant:
E. Bradley Nelson and Malary Getty
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Richard v. CHCF et al
as 2:2024cv01368
Plaintiff:
Craig Richard
Defendant:
CHCF, Richardson, Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
