Cases 21 - 30 of 101
Hawkins v. Nicodemus et al
as 1:2018cv00444
Defendant:
Darcy Bervik, Chad Sombke, Black and others
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hawkins v. Christenson et al
as 1:2018cv00409
Defendant:
Wally Campbell, Tianna Borgi, Berry and others
Plaintiff:
Faron Raymond Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles T. Kirvin v. L. Grant et al
as 2:2018cv07998
Defendant:
Chief Deputy Warden Xavier Cano, L. Grant, J. Solis and others
Plaintiff:
Charles T. Kirvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leider v. Nelson et al
as 2:2018cv07239
Defendant:
Jane Does, Deputy Magana, Menandro Bati and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Leider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Solis et al
as 3:2018cv01804
Defendant:
R. Solis, S. Rink, Dr. S. Beyer and others
Plaintiff:
Cedric Eugene Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bonilla v. Duffy et al
as 3:2018cv04335
Defendant:
Jacquelyn H. Duffy, L. Morais, San Luis Obispo County and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gregory Smith v. R. Cobb, et al
as 18-55545
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
R. COBB, CCI SHARPE, J. CAREY and others
Solis v. Gonzales
as 1:2018cv00015
Plaintiff:
Robert O. Solis
Defendant:
Rosa Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tony Roberts v. J. Beard, et al
as 17-56830
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TONY ANTHONY ROBERTS, AKA Tony Roberts
Defendant - Appellee:
J. BEARD, Secretary of CDCR, DANIEL PARAMO, Warden, KIMBERLY A. SEIBEL, Warden and others
Marlon Blacher v. J. Talley, et al
as 17-56370
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARLON BLACHER, AKA Marlon Jessie Blacher
Defendant - Appellee:
J. TALLEY, Correctional Peace Officer, individual, J. RUPP, Correctional Peace Officer, individual, R. DENNIS, Correctional Peace Officer, individual and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
