Cases 41 - 50 of 1,059
Rowan v. Heick et al
as 1:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
George C. L. Rowan
Defendant:
Sgt. Heick, Lori Wright, Joan Lee and others
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Opunui, Jr. v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00219
Plaintiff:
Patrick Opunui, Jr.
Defendant:
Estela Derr, Dr. Nathan Kwon and Dwayne Bautista
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mendoza v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00212
Plaintiff:
Luis Daniel Mendoza
Defendant:
Estela Derr, Kris Robl and Dwayne Bautista
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Kaneakua v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00201
Plaintiff:
Elijah Maluhia Kaneakua and Elijah M. Kaneakua
Defendant:
Estela Derr and Dr. Kwon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jimenez-Ramirez v. Kwon et al
as 1:2022cv00211
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Jimenez-Ramirez
Defendant:
Dr. Nathan Kwon and Kris Robl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Garcia v. Derr
as 1:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
Irvin Mendoza Garcia
Defendant:
Estela Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Espinoza-Santos v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00215
Plaintiff:
Noel Espinoza-Santos
Defendant:
Estela Derr and Kris Robl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Yanagihara v. Derr
as 1:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Chaes Yanagihara
Defendant:
Estela Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Santillan v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Vidal Santillan
Defendant:
Estela Derr and Dr. Nathan Kwon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Zuniga-Diaz v. Derr et al
as 1:2022cv00183
Plaintiff:
Jose Zuniga-Diaz
Defendant:
Ms. Estella Derr, Dwayne Bautista and Estella Derr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
