Cases 51 - 60 of 7,259
Hill v. Williams et al
as 2:2024cv00571
Plaintiff:
James E. Hill
Defendant:
Julie Williams and C. Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Maningo Law et al
as 2:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Adrian Johnson
Defendant:
Maningo Law and Lauria Lynch-German
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Breitenbach et al
as 3:2024cv00118
Plaintiff:
Edmond Paul Price
Defendant:
Netanjah Breitenbach, Ball, Wilcoxen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Bolden
as 2:2024cv00504
Plaintiff:
Jessica M. Brown
Defendant:
Bolden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chaparro v. Childers et al
as 3:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Osbaldo Chaparro
Defendant:
Childers, Ferro, Parks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Gittere et al
as 2:2024cv00816
Petitioner:
Raul Gonzales
Respondent:
Warden William Gittere and The Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Toelle v. Warden of Victorville Camp FCI Med, I
as 2:2024cv00815
Petitioner:
Loren Michelle Toelle
Respondent:
Warden of Victorville Camp FCI Med, I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Chades v. Zavalda et al
as 3:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Lous Allan Chades and Louis Allan Chades
Defendant:
Damon Zavalda, Cassandra Peate and Kathleen Hendersen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahmoud v. Holz et al
as 2:2024cv00806
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant:
Holz, Bartlette, Brendal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ackerman v. Kuloloia et al
as 2:2024cv00807
Plaintiff:
Jin Ackerman
Defendant:
William Kuloloia, Russel, Dons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
