Civil Rights Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cody Presti v. Darren Telefoni, et al
as 22-15194
Plaintiff / Appellant: CODY JOSEPH PRESTI
Defendant / Appellee: DARREN TELEFONI, ACO, JOHNSON, Captain, WENDEL YODA, CBA and others
Presti v. Telefoni et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00405
Defendant: Case Manager Muriel Keliihoomalu, ACO Darren Telefoni, Captain Johnson and others
Plaintiff: Cody Joseph Presti
Interested Party: Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Lee-Zidek et al
as 1:2021cv00158
Defendant: Sergeant Jeffrey Mane, Muriel Ah Cheong, SHU ACO's and others
Interested Party: Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Plaintiff: Francis Grandinetti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Pacific Gel-Ice et al
as 1:2021cv00136
Defendant: Pacific Gel-Ice, Dr. Maura Tresch, P.A. Lisa Oyama and others
Plaintiff: Francis Grandinetti
Interested Party: Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
D'Agirbaud v. Kam et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00139
Defendant: Francis X. Sequeira, Monica Lortz, Shari Kimoto and others
Interested Party: Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Plaintiff: Quintin-John D'Agirbaud, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Justin Poole v. J. Raseknia et al
as 2:2014cv03814
Defendant: California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Muriel Hooker, Muriel Hooker and others
Plaintiff: Justin Poole
Chancellor Wade v. County of Sacramento, et al
as 10-16271
Plaintiff - Appellant: CHANCELLOR WADE
Defendant - Appellee: COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, LOU BLANAS and others
Doss v. Richmond Police Department et al
as 3:2007cv02708
Plaintiff: Jimmie L. Doss, Jr.
Defendant: Richmond Police Department, Department of Corrections, Kenneth Stansbury and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?