Cases 1 - 10 of 47,368
McClinton v. Blass
as 5:2024cv03363
Plaintiff:
Marquice McClinton
Defendant:
Jacob Blass
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Ramsey v. Tuolumne County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2024cv00650
Plaintiff:
Rafe Dearl Ramsey
Defendant:
Tuolumne County Sheriff's Office and Tuolumne County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Kimmons v. Sacramento County et al
as 2:2024cv01572
Plaintiff:
Nicholas A. Kimmons
Defendant:
Sacramento County, LLamas, Moreno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gaviola Patron v. Hugh, et al
as 1:2024cv00655
Plaintiff:
D'Annunzio Roman Gaviola Patron
Defendant:
Lewy Hugh, C. Mares and G. Herara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Sanchez v. Wollet et al
as 1:2024cv00649
Plaintiff:
Matthew J. Sanchez
Defendant:
Mary Ann Wollet, Wellpath Provider and Tulare County Sheriff Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Cano v. Salmonson et al
as 2:2024cv01568
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Cano
Defendant:
S. Salmonson, Figueroa-Price and Appel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Solano County Superior Court
as 2:2024cv01581
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Solano County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Bonilla v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv01582
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla, VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Peyton v. Bright
as 2:2024cv01570
Plaintiff:
Lee Edward Peyton
Defendant:
Angel Bright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) James v. Sacramento County Superior Court
as 2:2024cv01585
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene James
Defendant:
Sacramento County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
