Cases 1 - 10 of 4,351
Rose v. Pina et al
as 2:2024cv00912
Plaintiff:
Steven Rose
Defendant:
Alejandro Pina, Heather Christian, Christina Irving and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bivins v. United Nations et al
as 3:2024cv00915
Plaintiff:
Michael Bivins
Defendant:
United Nations, Chinese U.N. Ambassador, U.N. Secretary General and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pablo-Rodas v. Reyes et al
as 2:2024cv00611
Plaintiff:
David Pablo-Rodas
Defendant:
Erin Reyes and R. Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tolbert v. Marion County Medical
as 6:2024cv00591
Plaintiff:
Christopher Cortez Tolbert
Defendant:
Marion County Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Fogle
as 3:2024cv00914
Defendant:
Mrs. Chris Ann Fogle, Damien and Mustafa
Plaintiff:
Dale D.E. Brooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mueller v. Ybarra et al
as 3:2024cv00897
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mueller
Defendant:
J. Ybarra, C.O. Lay, K. Hofman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCarter v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2024cv00900
Plaintiff:
Timothy McCarter
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Robyn Rosenfield, Dr. Leland Beamer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fowler v. Biden et al
as 3:2024cv00903
Plaintiff:
Dammien C. Fowler
Defendant:
President Joe Biden, Sarah Harrington and Republican National Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Teague et al
as 6:2024cv00567
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Allen Hamilton
Defendant:
Peter Teague, Walmart Albany Oregon and Michelle Duncan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Windham v. Dept. of Agriculture
as 6:2024cv00881
Plaintiff:
Corey Eugene Windham
Defendant:
Dept. of Agriculture
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
