Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Clay Jacobsen v. Quadra Productions, Inc. et
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2023cv08861
Plaintiff:
Clay Jacobsen
Defendant:
Quadra Productions, Inc. and Does 1-30, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Paul Schwanke v. Minim Productions, Inc.
as 2:2021cv00111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff Paul Schwanke
Defendant:
Defendant Minim Productions, Inc., Doe and Minim Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Screen Actors Guild - American Federation of Television and Radio Artists v. MGA Entertainment Productions, Inc.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2020cv02557
Petitioner:
Counsel Screen Actors Guild - American Federation of Television and Radio Artists
Respondent:
MGA Entertainment Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
James Cardenas v. Challenge Dairies Inc
as 2:2019cv10572
Defendant:
Challenge Dairies Inc and Challenge Dairy Products Inc
Plaintiff:
James Cardenas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Michael Watkins et al v. Woodridge Productions, Inc. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2019cv05821
Defendant:
Jordan Feiner, DOES 1 through 60, inclusive, William Roe and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Watkins and Watkins Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Screen Actors Guild - American Federation of Television and Radio Artists v. Oscar Gold Productions, Inc.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2019cv03730
Respondent:
Oscar Gold Productions, Inc.
Petitioner:
Counsel Screen Actors Guild - American Federation of Television and Radio Artists and Screen Actors Guild - American Federation of Television and Radio Artists
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan et al v. Lucky Foot Productions, Inc.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2019cv02263
Defendant:
LUCKY FOOT PRODUCTIONS, INC., a New York corporation, and Lucky Foot Productions, Inc.
Plaintiff:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY PENSION PLAN, BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNT PLAN; BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH PLAN, Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Health Plan, Board of Directors of the Motion Picture Industry Pension Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Screen Actors Guild - American Federation of Television and Radio Artists v. Hick Picture Production, Inc. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2019cv01474
Respondent:
Hick Picture Company, LLC and Hick Picture Production, Inc.
Petitioner:
Counsel Screen Actors Guild - American Federation of Television and Radio Artists
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Screen Actors Guild - American Federation of Television and Radio Artists v. Hit Productions, Inc.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2019cv01446
Petitioner:
Screen Actors Guild - American Federation of Television and Radio Artists
Respondent:
Hit Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Dryad Pictures LLC v. Highway Bingo Productions, Inc. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 2:2018cv08119
Defendant:
Neil Tolkin, Highway Bingo Productions, Inc. and Does 1-10
Plaintiff:
Dryad Pictures LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.