Cases 41 - 50 of 103
Michelle Evans v. Bank of America et al
as 2:2016cv01892
Defendant:
Bank of America, Bank of America, National Association, Sheri B. Bronstein and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle Evans
Pamela v. Amore et al
as 2:2015cv01368
Defendant:
Michael Campagno, Casa Di Amore, LLC and Jeff Schwartz
Plaintiff:
Pamela K. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Viola Hubbs v. Big Lots Stores, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01601
Defendant:
Big Lots Stores, Inc., Does and PNS Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Viola Hubbs
Unknown:
Robert K Friedl, Katherine W Kehr, Jonathan Sing Lee and others
Robert K. Heldenbrand v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 2:2014cv09615
Plaintiff:
Robert K. Heldenbrand
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Robert K. Heldenbrand v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 5:2014cv02576
Plaintiff:
Robert K. Heldenbrand
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Stanley K. Bowen v. BFI Holdings, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv09170
Defendant:
BFI Holdings, Inc., Does and Kountry Wood Products, LLC
Plaintiff:
Stanley K. Bowen
Satinder K. Lall v. Laboratory Corporation of America et al
as 2:2014cv08720
Defendant:
Does, Antoinette Higgins, Laboratory Corporation of America and others
Plaintiff:
Satinder K. Lall
Ly v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC et al
as 3:2014cv01686
Plaintiff:
Tran K. Ly
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC , AT&T Mobility LLC and Does 1-10, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramon Camacho v. G&K Services, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv05557
Plaintiff:
Ramon Camacho
Defendant:
Does and G&K Services, Inc.
K. Caywood et al v. Michaels Stores, Inc.
as 2:2014cv05031
Plaintiff:
K. Caywood, R. Herrera, P. Merrill and others
Defendant:
Michaels Stores Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
