Other Labor Litigation Cases filed in the Ninth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Carlos Rivas v. Coverall North America, Inc.
as 22-56192
Appellant: CARLOS RIVAS, in his capacity as Private Attorney General Representative
Counter Claimant: COVERALL NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Jessica Potts v. Sirius XM Radio, Inc., et al
as 23-55282
Plaintiff / Appellant: JESSICA POTTS, an individual, on behalf of herself, the State of California, as a private attorney general, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: SIRIUS XM RADIO, INC., a Delaware Corporation and PANDORA MEDIA, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company
Defendant: DOES, 1 through 50
Maria Johnson v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
as 22-16486
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARIA JOHNSON, as an individual and on behalf of all others similarly situated, and as a private attorney general
Defendant / Appellee: LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC, a North Carolina limited liability company
Mendis v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv00144
Defendant: Schneider National Carriers, Inc. and Schneider National Carriers Inc
Plaintiff: Mendis, Balapuwaduge Mendis, Michael Feola and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: Washington State Department of Labor & Industries and Washington State Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Type: Labor Labor: Other
Raef Lawson v. Grubhub, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-15386
Plaintiff - Appellant: RAEF LAWSON, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated individuals, and in his capacity as Private Attorney General Representative
Defendant - Appellee: GRUBHUB, INC. and GRUBHUB HOLDINGS, INC.
Jeffrey Allen, et al v. Labor Ready Southwest, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-56621
Plaintiff - Appellee: JEFFREY LEE ALLEN, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, the general public and as an "aggrieved employee" under the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act
Objector - Appellant: MARGIE BEDOLLA, ANTHONY ALLEN and MICHAEL ALVAREZ
Defendant - Appellee: LABOR READY SOUTHWEST, INC., a Washington corporation doing business in the State of California and DOES, 1-50, inclusive
Silken Brown v. Cinemark USA, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-15377
Plaintiff - Appellant: SILKEN BROWN and MARIO DE LA ROSA, individually and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated and as aggrieved employers pursuant to the Private Attorneys General Act ("PAGA")
Defendant - Appellee: CINEMARK USA, INC.
Robert Woodard v. Healthcare Services Group, Inc
as 13-57147
Plaintiff - Appellee: ROBERT WOODARD, individually, and on behalf of other members of he general public similarly situated, and on behalf of aggrieved employees pursuant to the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA)
Defendant - Appellant: HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP, INC., a Pennsylvania Corporation
Jeffrey Allen v. Labor Ready Southwest, Inc.
as 13-56685
Plaintiff - Appellee: JEFFREY LEE ALLEN, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, the general public and as an "aggrieved employee" under the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act
Defendant - Appellee: LABOR READY SOUTHWEST, INC., a Washington corporation doing business in the State of California
Movant - Appellant: MARGIE BEDOLLA, ANTHONY A. ALLEN, MICHAEL ALVAREZ and others
Jeffrey Allen v. Labor Ready Southwest, Inc. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-55106
Plaintiff - Appellee: JEFFREY LEE ALLEN, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, the general public and as an "aggrieved employee" under the California Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act
Defendant - Appellee: LABOR READY SOUTHWEST, INC., a Washington corporation doing business in the State of California
Movant - Appellant: MARGIE BEDOLLA, ANTHONY A. ALLEN, MICHAEL ALVAREZ and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?