Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Lawhon v. KeHE Distributors, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Adam Lawhon
Defendant:
KeHE Distributors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Adam Lawhon v. KeHe Distributors Inc.
as 5:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Adam Lawhon
Defendant:
KeHe Distributors, Inc. and KeHe Distributors Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Adam Gomez v. Metro Air Service Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04979
Plaintiff:
Adam Gomez
Defendant:
Metro Air Service Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Alvaro Acevedo et al v. Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv07810
Plaintiff:
Alvaro Acevedo, Sergio Adame, Ruben Arce and others
Defendant:
Swift Transportation Co. of Arizona, LLC, Interstate Equipment Leasing, LLC, Charles John Rogers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Loera et al v. TruGreen, Inc. et al
as 2:2021at00808
Plaintiff:
Adam Loera and Miguel Diaz
Defendant:
TruGreen, Inc. and TruGreen Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Loera et al v. TruGreen, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv01536
Plaintiff:
Adam Loera and Miguel Diaz
Defendant:
TruGreen, Inc. and TruGreen Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Heggen v. Heavenly Valley Ltd. Partnership et al
as 2:2021cv00107
Plaintiff:
Adam Heggen
Defendant:
Heavenly Valley Limited Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adams v. nThrive et al
as 4:2020cv00121
Defendant:
nThrive and Nelson R. Liston
Plaintiff:
Brie Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acholonu v. California Franchise Tax Board et al
as 2:2020at00455
Plaintiff:
Eucharia Acholonu
Defendant:
California Franchise Tax Board and Adam Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Acholonu v. California Franchise Tax Board et al
as 2:2020cv00942
Plaintiff:
Eucharia Acholonu
Defendant:
California Franchise Tax Board and Adam Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
