Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Terry Williams-IIunga v. Andrea Gonzalez et al
as 2:2012cv08592
Defendant:
Does and Roes, Andrea Gonzalez, Producer Writers Guild of America Pension Plan and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Williams-IIunga
Nina Martin v. Arkansas Best Corporation et al
as 5:2012cv00637
Counter Claimant:
Arkansas Best Corporation
Defendant:
Arkansas Best Corporation and Does
Counter Defendant:
Nina Martin and Roes
Plaintiff:
Nina Martin
Moyle et al v. Liberty Mutual Retirement Benefit Plan et al
as 3:2010cv02179
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Moyle , Pauline Arwood , Thomas Rollason and others
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Retirement Benefit Plan, Liberty Mutual Retirement Plan Retirement Board, Liberty Mutual Insurance Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Richard M. Widom v. Stockwell Harris Widom Woolverton & Muehl et al
as 2:2010cv01599
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Edward Muehl, George Woolverton and others
Counter Defendant:
Law Offices of Richard M Widom LLP and Roes
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Stockwell Harris Widom Woolverton & Muehl
Plaintiff:
Richard M Widom
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Community Convalescent Hospital of La Mesa v. Harrison
as 3:2009cv01271
Plaintiff:
Community Convalescent Hospital of La Mesa
Defendant:
Mildred Harrison
Cross Claimant:
Mildred Harrison
Cross Defendant:
Retiree Medical Benefits, Employee Welfare Benefits Committe, Vought Aircraft Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company v. Erik Wentzell Inc et al
as 5:2009cv01027
Plaintiff:
Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company, Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company and Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company
Defendant:
Erik Wentzell Inc, Erik John Wentzell and American Contractors Indemnity Company
Counter Defendant:
Southern Counties Construction Services Inc, ROES and Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company
Counter Claimant:
American Contractors Indemnity Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporatiion et al v. Robert Timothy Ortiz et al
as 5:2009cv00523
Plaintiff:
Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporatiion, Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporatiion, Board of Trustees for the Carpenters Southwest Trusts and others
Defendant:
Robert Timothy Ortiz, Surety Company of the Pacific and DOES
Cross Claimant:
American Contractors Indemnity Company
Cross Defendant:
Pre Fab Installation, ROES and Robert Timothy Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
California Business Bureau Inc v. Vanessa Flores et al
as 8:2009cv00192
Plaintiff:
California Business Bureau Inc
Defendant:
Vanessa Flores and Doe
Cross Claimant:
Vanessa Serrano
Cross Defendant:
Southwest Carpenters Health and Welfare Trust, Southwest Carpenters Health and Welfare Trust, Carpenters Southwest Administrative Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Grant & Weber v. Kenneth John Polasko et al
as 2:2007cv03498
Plaintiff:
Grant & Weber
Defendant:
Kenneth John Polasko, Kenneth John Polasko, Laurie La-Pat Polasko and others
Cross Defendant:
Beverly Hills Advanced Surgery, CIGNA HealthCare, Connecticut General Life Insurance Company and others
Cross Claimant:
Kenneth John Polasko, Kenneth John Polasko, Laurie La-Pat Polasko and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 - Notice of Removal - SEC Act
Money Matters Management et al v. Niche Marketing, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv00591
Plaintiff:
Money Matters Management, Money Matters Management, Myles Hubers and others
Defendant:
Niche Marketing, Inc., Niche Marketing, Inc., Niche Plan Sponsors, Inc. and others
Counter Claimant:
Erik Sussman and Erik Sussman
Counter Defendant:
Myles Hubers and Money Matters Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
