Cases 1 - 5 of 5
Steve Harris, et al v. Amgen, Inc., et al
as 17-55680
Plaintiff - Appellee:
STEVE HARRIS, DENNIS F. RAMOS, AKA Dennis Ramos, JORGE TORRES and others
Objector - Appellant:
DONALD HANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
AMGEN, INC., AMGEN MANUFACTURING, LIMITED, FRANK J. BIONDI, Jr. and others
Board of Trustees of the Oregon Retail Employees Pension Plan v. R&M Foods, Inc. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 3:2016cv00455
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the Oregon Retail Employees Pension Plan
Defendant:
Does 1- 25, Hank's Properties, LLC, Hering Investments, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1381 E.R.I.S.A.
Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers et al v. Hillsdale Rock Co., Inc. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 4:2010cv05509
Plaintiff:
Pension Trust Fund For Operating Engineers , F. G. Crosthwaite and Russell E. Burns
Defendant:
Hillsdale Rock Co., Inc., Hillsdale Rock Co., Hank Matoza Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1451
Steve Harris, et al v. Amgen, Inc., et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 10-56014
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVE HARRIS, DENNIS F. RAMOS, AKA Dennis Ramos, DONALD HANKS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
AMGEN, INC., AMGEN MANUFACTURING, LIMITED, FRANK J. BIONDI, Jr. and others
Defendant:
DENNIS M. FENTON, RICHARD NANULA, THE FIDUCIARY COMMITTEE and others
Donald Hanks v. Amgen, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv03973
Plaintiff:
Donald Hanks, Donald Hanks, Donald Hanks and others
Defendant:
Amgen, Inc., Kevin W. Sharer, Richard D. Nanula and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.