Cases 1 - 10 of 27
CLARK v. DOCUSIGN, INC.
as 3:2022cv07181
Plaintiff:
Paul C. Clark
Defendant:
Docusign Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
DocuSign, Inc. v. Clark
as 3:2021cv04785
Plaintiff:
DocuSign, Inc.
Defendant:
Paul C. Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RSA Protective Technologies, LLC v. Clark County
as 2:2020cv00143
Plaintiff:
RSA Protective Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Clark County
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
NOT USED
as 2:2020cv00142
Plaintiff:
RSA Protective Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Clark County
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Thomas v. Clark IV
as 3:2015cv02429
Plaintiff:
Bruce Thomas
Defendant:
Walter E. Clark IV
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
3 Pak Holdings, LLC v. Daniel Clark et al
as 8:2015cv00491
Plaintiff:
3 Pak Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Daniel Clark, Kevin Clark, Susan Clark and others
Spin Master, LTD et al v. Jakks Pacific, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00188
Plaintiff:
Spin Master, LTD , Leonard R. Clark and H. Peter Greene Jr.
Defendant:
Jakks Pacific, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
David Everist v. United States Department of Ag, et al
as 14-35661
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID D. EVERIST
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE FOREST SERVICE, DONNA MICKLEY, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR and others
Hologram USA, Inc. et al v. Pulse Evolution Corporation et al
as 2:2014cv00772
Defendant:
John McClain, Ian C. O'Connell, Prometheus Global Media, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Musion Das Hologram Limited, Uwe Maass, MDH Hologram Limited and others
Counter Claimant:
Holicom Film Ltd. and Musion IP Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Everist v. United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service et al
as 1:2014cv00199
Defendant:
Attorney General of the United States, Director Dayne Barron, City of Medford, Oregon and others
Plaintiff:
David D. Everist
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183 Patent - Right to Compensation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
