Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hunter Douglas Inc. et al v. Ching Feng Home Fashions Co., Ltd.
as 3:2017cv01069
Plaintiff:
Hunter Douglas Inc. and Andrew J. Toti Testamentary Trust
Defendant:
Ching Feng Home Fashions Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Hunter Douglas, Inc. et al v. Nien Made Enterprise Co. Ltd. et al
as 2:2016cv01308
Plaintiff:
Andrew J. Toti Testamentary Trust and Hunter Douglas, Inc.
Defendant:
Global Custom Commerce, Inc., International Window Treatments, Inc., Nien Advanced Solutions and others
Smart Irrigation Solutions Inc. v. Hunter Industries Incorporated
as 8:2015cv00081
Defendant:
Hunter Industries Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Smart Irrigation Solutions Inc.
3Form, Inc. et al v. Rowe Fenestration, Inc.
as 2:2012at01516
Plaintiff:
3Form, Inc. and Hunter Douglas Industries Switzerland GmbH
Defendant:
Rowe Fenestration, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
3Form, Inc. et al v. Rowe Fenestration, Inc.
as 2:2012cv02849
Plaintiff:
3Form, Inc. and Hunter Douglas Industries Switzerland GmbH
Defendant:
Rowe Fenestration, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
Hunter Industries Inc v. K Rain Manufacturing Corporation
as 8:2012cv01295
Plaintiff:
Hunter Industries Inc
Defendant:
K Rain Manufacturing Corporation
Oakley Inc v. Predator Outdoor Products LLC et al
as 8:2011cv00456
Defendant:
Hunter Specialties Inc, Predator Outdoor Products LLC, TGS.com Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Oakley Inc
Mark Hunter v. IKEA US West Inc et al
as 8:2010cv00296
Defendant:
DOES, IKEA Distribution Services Inc, IKEA North America Capital Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Hunter
Mark Hunter v. Lamps Plus Inc et al
as 8:2010cv00298
Defendant:
DOES and Lamps Plus Inc
Plaintiff:
Mark Hunter
Tony Lai et al v. Hunter Douglas Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00863
Plaintiff:
Tony Lai and Pateajton, Inc.
Defendant:
Hunter Douglas Inc. and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
